top of page

Storage Collisions: The Most Detrimental Exploit You Haven’t Heard About

  • Nominis Research Team
  • 4 days ago
  • 3 min read
Hooded figure in mask typing on a laptop in a dark room, illuminated by green light. Serious mood, with a mysterious ambiance.


Storage collisions represent a significant vulnerability in Ethereum smart contracts, particularly when employing the proxy design pattern for contract upgrades. This issue arises when multiple contracts inadvertently share the same storage slots but interpret the stored data differently, leading to unpredictable behaviors such as denial of service, privilege escalation, or financial loss. 


While storage collisions have been a known issue, specific high-profile exploits related to this vulnerability in 2024 and 2025 have not been widely documented. However, the broader implications of storage collisions continue to be a concern within the blockchain community. 



Understanding Storage Collisions


In Ethereum's architecture, each smart contract maintains its own storage, organized into slots. However, when a contract uses the delegatecall function to execute code from another contract (often seen in proxy patterns), both contracts operate within the same storage context. If these contracts have mismatched storage layouts—meaning their state variables are declared in different orders or types—they may inadvertently read from or write to the same storage slots, causing storage collisions. This misalignment can result in one contract overwriting critical data of another, leading to severe security vulnerabilities. 

In March 2025, LeveragedSIR lost $355K after an attacker exploited a subtle bug in its vault contract. The contract used a temporary storage slot to verify Uniswap pool addresses — but later overwrote that same slot with a user-controlled value.

 By brute-forcing a custom contract address and feeding in a precisely calculated token amount, the attacker replaced the trusted address mid-execution and passed validation checks. Using a contract deployed with CREATE2, they triggered the callback and drained the vault. 

This clever manipulation highlights how even short-lived storage values can become critical vulnerabilities in DeFi protocols.


Flowchart on a dark background illustrating stages of a process: Identify Bug, Brute-force, Replace Address, Trigger Callback, and more.

This attack is a stark reminder that "looks correct" doesn’t mean "is secure." Even transient, temporary storage use can become a critical weakness when combined with external input, vanity address generation, and deterministic contract creation.

In a world where every byte of storage matters, attackers don’t just look for bad code — they look for clever interactions between otherwise “safe” components.


While KYT doesn’t directly patch smart contract code or prevent low-level storage collisions, it plays a critical role in detection, response, and damage control when these exploits occur. By monitoring transactions in real time, KYT can help detect suspicious exploit behavior as it happens, flag high-risk interactions and vulnerable contracts, trace attacker activity and laundering routes across chains, and enable better intelligence sharing across the ecosystem to contain threats faster and more effectively.



FAQs:


Q: What is a Vault in DeFi?

A vault in DeFi is a smart contract that automatically manages users’ funds to generate yield. Users deposit crypto into the vault, and the vault uses strategies (like lending, staking, or liquidity farming) to earn returns on their behalf. Think of it like a robo-investor for your crypto.

Q: What is a storage collision in crypto?

Q: Why do storage collisions matter in DeFi?


While we strive for accuracy in our content, we acknowledge that errors may occur. If you find any mistakes, please reach out to us at contact@nominis.io Your feedback is appreciated!


bottom of page