The rapid evolution of blockchain technology, artificial intelligence (AI), and decentralized finance (DeFi) is reshaping the financial landscape, creating new opportunities while introducing significant risks in regards to anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF). As crypto adoption accelerates, market trends such as stablecoin expansion, real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, and high-throughput blockchain networks are gaining traction. At the same time, AI-powered financial agents, decentralized infrastructure networks (DePINs), and the resurgence of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are transforming the digital economy.
While these innovations present new efficiencies and financial inclusion opportunities, they also create regulatory blind spots that illicit actors can exploit. This report examines the key market predictions for 2025 and their potential implications for AML/CTF compliance , identifying the emerging risks that regulators, financial institutions, and blockchain participants must address.
Tokenization of Real-World Assets (RWAs)
The market for Real-World Assets (RWAs) is poised for explosive growth, with projections indicating it could reach $30 trillion by 2030. This rapid expansion, however, brings a range of potential risks that could undermine the stability and integrity of the market. One of the key concerns is anonymity risks, as tokenized private credit and on-chain assets may be used to obscure ownership structures, making it difficult to detect and prevent illicit activities.
Additionally, layered transactions within DeFi ecosystems—especially those integrating tokenized T-Bills and commodities—could facilitate money laundering with complex transaction layers hiding the flow of illicit funds.
Another significant challenge is the regulatory landscape, as the lack of clear and globally recognized standards for tokenized assets could lead to inconsistent enforcement and gaps in AMLcompliance, leaving the market vulnerable to exploitation and non-compliance.
Stablecoin Growth and Adoption
Stablecoins are expected to make up 10% of the total cryptocurrency market capitalization by 2025, driven by rapid adoption and the entry of major financial institutions into the sector. While this growth offers significant opportunities, it also introduces several risks related to illicit finance. One major concern is regulatory arbitrage, as the involvement of global fintech and banking giants may create gaps in oversight, enabling criminals to exploit inconsistencies between jurisdictions. Additionally, the increased use of stablecoins for remittances and payments raises the risk of unregulated on-ramps, where peer-to-peer transfers could bypass AML controls. Furthermore, as the use of tokenized credit expands, the reliance on smart contracts introduces potential technical vulnerabilities, which criminals could exploit to launder illicit funds.
AI-Blockchain Convergence
The convergence of AI and blockchain is set to transform financial transactions, but raises significant AML/CTF concerns. Automated illicit transactions could be facilitated by AI agents autonomously conducting transfers, potentially enabling laundering schemes without human oversight. The shift towards AI-driven DeFi may introduce risks like AI-powered smurfing, where automated agents fragment illicit transactions to evade detection, and complex financial obfuscation, where AI-based decision-making creates intricate laundering schemes. With the lack of human oversight, traditional AML measures could become less effective.
Additionally, AI agents in crypto VC investments pose risks such as automated laundering networks, where AI-driven funds might unknowingly invest in illicit projects, unmonitored large transactions that bypass standard AML procedures, and data manipulation risks, where AI-driven decisions could create fake investment signals to obscure illicit activity.
Expansion of Bitcoin and Ether ETFs
The growing adoption of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs is likely to attract institutional investments, but it also presents significant AML/CTF risks. Increased cross-border transactions could occur as more institutions engage in ETFs, providing opportunities for illicit actors to leverage these funds for money laundering across jurisdictions. Additionally, the potential misuse of ETFs holding large amounts of digital assets could allow them to act as indirect vehicles for laundering illicit gains, especially through traditional financial institutions.
As more financial firms enter the crypto space, there are regulatory compliance issues with the enforcement of AML controls becoming increasingly challenging due to varying regulations across different jurisdictions.
NFT Market Revival
As NFTs regain momentum, several potential AML/CTF risks return to the fold. One major concern is the use of NFTs for money laundering, as the ability to create and trade unique assets could be exploited to move illicit funds across borders.
Additionally, wash trading—the manipulation of NFT prices through artificial trading volumes—can be used to launder money by creating the illusion of legitimate transactions. Furthermore, the inadequate oversight of NFT transactions, due to the lack of consistent regulations, could allow illicit actors to operate undetected, making it more difficult for regulators to track and prevent illicit activity.
NFT Market Revival
As NFTs regain momentum, several potential AML/CTF risks return to the fold. One major concern is the use of NFTs for money laundering, as the ability to create and trade unique assets could be exploited to move illicit funds across borders.
Additionally, wash trading—the manipulation of NFT prices through artificial trading volumes—can be used to launder money by creating the illusion of legitimate transactions. Furthermore, the inadequate oversight of NFT transactions, due to the lack of consistent regulations, could allow illicit actors to operate undetected, making it more difficult for regulators to track and prevent illicit activity.
High-Throughput Chains Driving Innovation
The rise of high-speed blockchain networks introduces several AML risks. One major concern is rapid untraceable transactions, as these high-speed chains enable money launderers to move funds quickly, making it difficult to track.
Moreover, insufficient compliance measures in these networks, which prioritize efficiency over regulation, may leave them vulnerable to illicit use cases by lacking robust AML protections. Furthermore, the integration of privacy-focused innovations could further complicate matters, as enhanced privacy features may allow criminals to exploit these networks for illicit transactions, further obscuring detection and enforcement efforts.
Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePINs)
The resurgence of DePINs raises several AML concerns. One key issue is the increased use in unregulated sectors, as DePIN projects could attract illicit financing in industries such as energy, healthcare, and wireless infrastructure, where oversight may be limited.
Additionally, the pseudonymous transactions characteristic of DePINs enable anonymous financial flows, potentially bypassing AML controls and making it more difficult to trace illicit activities. The challenges in law enforcement arise due to the decentralized governance of DePINs, which could hinder regulatory agencies' ability to track and intervene in illicit activities across these networks.
Consumer DeFi Expansion
As consumer adoption of DeFi continues to grow, several AML risks emerge. One concern is unregulated lending and borrowing, where increased access to on-chain finance could facilitate illicit lending practices, making it harder for authorities to track illegal activities.
Another risk is decentralized identity exploitation, as privacy-preserving tools like zkTLS could enable bad actors to conceal illicit financial activities, further complicating detection efforts.
Revenue-sharing stablecoins may create new pathways for money laundering, as these instruments can provide structured, yet unregulated, financial returns that may be exploited by criminals to obscure the origins of illicit funds.
Conclusion
The evolution of blockchain, AI, and DeFi presents both opportunities and significant AML/CTF risks. Regulatory bodies and compliance professionals must proactively address these challenges by implementing stronger oversight, enhancing transaction monitoring, and fostering global cooperation to mitigate illicit financial activities in the emerging crypto landscape.
What is DeFi, and why is it a concern for AML?
DeFi (Decentralized Finance) allows financial transactions without intermediaries like banks. While it improves accessibility, it also poses AML challenges due to anonymity, lack of centralized oversight, and smart contract vulnerabilities that criminals can exploit.
How do criminals use NFTs for money laundering?
How can AI impact financial crime in crypto?
While we strive for accuracy in our content, we acknowledge that errors may occur. If you find any mistakes, please reach out to us at contact@nominis.io Your feedback is appreciated!